Thursday February 7, 2008
The three picture frames we bought at IKEA to take a set of flower prints, while stunning to look at, have a functional design flaw. The hanging thing doesn’t work.
First I knew of it was a loud howl of frustration from the bedroom. Dolly came shooting up the stairs to sit with me in the study out of the way. Another, even louder howl, followed by a bang as Graham switched into big hammer mode. Dolly and I exchanged long looks, full of meaning and experience, and decided to stay where we were, quiet and out of harm’s way.
Then the air turned blue with some of the best and most forceful creative cursing I’ve heard in a good long while. And lots more bangs. Some errant designer in the depths of IKEA must have got at least a buzz in the ear just about then. If he’d been standing next to Graham at that moment it’d have been rather more than just a buzz.
After a while I ventured down and poked my head around the door. Cautiously.
“Something wrong, dear?”
Well, I can’t resist it sometimes, really I can’t. And I’ve learned some good new words over the years by being innocently infuriating. It’s something I do well.
When he’d calmed down, and been plied with tea, we had a conference over the picture frames. There was no way of deducing the designer’s intent for the little poky hole in the top that was completely and utterly useless for the weight of the frames. They’re heavy.
“I think your best bet is to forget the fitting, get standard wire and fixings, and do the job yourself the old fashioned way. At least you know that’ll work.”
“Right. You going off to Sainsbury’s now?”
“Yup.”
“Okay. You can drop me off at Focus on the way.”
It was a lovely, mild, sunny day, blue sky, fluffy white clouds. I knew that it’d do him good to get out of the house for a bit so I did an accelerated get-ready operation, and was fit to boogie in ten minutes.
“Shall I come back here to pick you up when I’ve done?” I said when we got to Focus.
“Nah. It’s a nice day. I’ll walk over to join you.”
When, about half an hour later, he came up to the car window, he was all sunny beamsmiles again.
The emergency was over.
Back home, clutching little plastic bags with bits of wire, brass and steel, he took himself back to the job. A wonderful, serene calm filled the house, completely dispelling the memory of DIY tantrums. Dolly gave a big sigh, and we settled down to wait. Lunch was to be soup and rolls, and there was no way he’d stop until the whole job was finished.
“Come and have a look,” he called, rousing me from my looking out of the study window at the sky reverie.
“Oh, well done, chooky-boots. That looks really good. It was worth the trouble.”
“Thanks. Lesson learned.”

Worth the trouble
The author, webmaster, and minder of the cat
20 responses so far ↓
Alison P // February 7, 2008 at 11:15 am |
Worth the wait indeed
I’ve learnt to stay out of the way on the rare occasions that my husband does anything round the house. The language is terrible……
Brigitte // February 7, 2008 at 11:17 am |
“Something wrong, dear?”… John, I’m glad you weren’t hit by flying objects coming your way!
The pictures are nice though and do look good where they finally have ended up. So really worth all the trouble.
Maureen // February 7, 2008 at 11:37 am |
They look lovely.I usually check the first aid box is well stocked!
Gordo // February 7, 2008 at 12:09 pm |
They’re definitely worth the trouble, John. I’m with Brigitte: I probably would have thrown something at you.
gary // February 7, 2008 at 12:24 pm |
I would buy a house with pictures like those on the wall.
Jim // February 7, 2008 at 1:35 pm |
That’s why I dread DIY projects. There is always something.
Shirley, in PA // February 7, 2008 at 1:46 pm |
The pictures look great. And Jim is right, something always goes wrong when DIY is attempted around here. I stay away from my husband when he gets his toolbox out.
Wendy, NC // February 7, 2008 at 1:52 pm |
“Innocently infuriating”–hah! My husband tried that once. Just once.
The pictures were, indeed, worth the effort and the so-called designers need to realize that flush-mounting isn’t worth much when the result is the bottom of the frame flush with the floor. And no, I am *not* getting myself all worked up here. No, I’m not. And don’t ask me again or you really will see worked up.
bonnie // February 7, 2008 at 2:52 pm |
Very nice. Tell Graham I think the one on the right is a tad lower. rotfl
mercystreet // February 7, 2008 at 3:05 pm |
Love the pictures. My fits of anger are unheard by anyone but my poor doggie and she just hides until it is over.
Mage // February 7, 2008 at 3:06 pm |
You are so funny John. Restraint of tongue with class. The prints are handsome……very good and I assume they are yours.
oldgreypoet // February 7, 2008 at 3:29 pm |
I’m so pleased you like the pictures, friends. The prints are from a ’short-run’ IKEA release — Graham snatched up the last three. I’ve not seen them in IKEA before this, and we hope there will be no more. It’s one thing someone suspecting a picture came from IKEA; it’s an entirely different feeling when they up and tell you they have the same one at home…
CBG Dee // February 7, 2008 at 4:31 pm |
When I think back to what was there when you all moved in, I have to say you’ve done it again — turned the house into a showplace. You and Graham have an unerring instinct for the perfect little touches that make all the difference. Kudos, cheers and huzzahs. P.S. Does Graham have one of those little laser thingies to line up the pictures?
Bex // February 7, 2008 at 4:43 pm |
Tres bon, mes amis.
Tim Reed // February 7, 2008 at 4:54 pm |
DIY and frustration almost always go hand in hand, but your final results are worth a bit of blue language.
crystalgable // February 7, 2008 at 8:18 pm |
the pictures turned out great! I haven’t hung my art from IKEA yet, so I hope I don’t have the same problem… I’m not very handy.
Kirsten // February 7, 2008 at 9:09 pm |
“Chooky-boots”?
(Googled it and got four pages of hits, all but one to this-here blog. The other was to louphoria.)
oldgreypoet // February 7, 2008 at 9:40 pm |
“Chook” is a term of endearment, Kirsten, used in the North and Midlands [of England]. Also in Australia, for it’s most commonly accepted meaning — ‘chicken’.
So, Chooky-boots is my own (I think) extension. It also refers to the boots you use for cleaning out the chickens.
Kirsten // February 7, 2008 at 9:45 pm |
Thanks!
Mage Bailey // February 7, 2008 at 9:52 pm |
Sounds good to me too.